<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Field Notes cahier notebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rroossinck</title>
		<link>http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rroossinck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great question, Teresa, and thanks for asking it.  According to the back inside cover of the notebook, the paper is Boise Offset Smooth 50#T &quot;White&quot; paper (I don&#039;t believe that it&#039;s a terribly high &quot;whiteness factor&quot;).  It&#039;s a nice, smooth paper with a very low sheen.  No post-printing treament, that I can tell.  I&#039;d put it very close to Rhodia&#039;s paper, if not nearly identical, in the texture department.  It&#039;s exceptionally nice, I&#039;ll tell you that much!  You won&#039;t be disappointed.  This stuff is far better than anything that Moleskine has shown us to date.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question, Teresa, and thanks for asking it.  According to the back inside cover of the notebook, the paper is Boise Offset Smooth 50#T &#8220;White&#8221; paper (I don&#8217;t believe that it&#8217;s a terribly high &#8220;whiteness factor&#8221;).  It&#8217;s a nice, smooth paper with a very low sheen.  No post-printing treament, that I can tell.  I&#8217;d put it very close to Rhodia&#8217;s paper, if not nearly identical, in the texture department.  It&#8217;s exceptionally nice, I&#8217;ll tell you that much!  You won&#8217;t be disappointed.  This stuff is far better than anything that Moleskine has shown us to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teresa</title>
		<link>http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teresa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the paper like, if you don&#039;t mind me asking? I&#039;m about to order these with their latest free shipping offer - is it rough? Smooth? With a sheen? Mat? And I hear you about the Moleskines paper quality...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the paper like, if you don&#8217;t mind me asking? I&#8217;m about to order these with their latest free shipping offer &#8211; is it rough? Smooth? With a sheen? Mat? And I hear you about the Moleskines paper quality&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rroossinck</title>
		<link>http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rroossinck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Patrick.  Dinner was great!

Stick around...I&#039;ve got a cool hack to throw out there for all of the Pocket Briefcase users for cahier-styled notebooks.  I might have to post out the pictures using a cameraphone, but you&#039;ll get the jist.

Stay tuned...more information forthcoming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Patrick.  Dinner was great!</p>
<p>Stick around&#8230;I&#8217;ve got a cool hack to throw out there for all of the Pocket Briefcase users for cahier-styled notebooks.  I might have to post out the pictures using a cameraphone, but you&#8217;ll get the jist.</p>
<p>Stay tuned&#8230;more information forthcoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Rhone</title>
		<link>http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Rhone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roossinck.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/review-field-notes-cahier-notebook/#comment-15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a fantastic write up man! Thanks for the opportunity to share and be schooled with/by you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fantastic write up man! Thanks for the opportunity to share and be schooled with/by you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
